← Back to Volume 1, Issue 6

How Organizational Innovation Climate Affect Engineering Innovation Capability in Engineering Owner: Considering the Roles of Supervisory Support and Employees' Self-efficacy

Yu Jian
Vol.1, No.6, pp.81-93, 2026 DOI: 10.62051/ajmse.v1n6.10 September 28, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract: In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, fostering innovation is essential for organizations, particularly in engineering sectors where complex problem-solving is vital for success. Understanding the dynamics between organizational climate and employee capabilities provides valuable insights for enhancing performance and maintaining a competitive advantage. This study examines the impact of organizational innovation climate (OIC) on engineering innovation capability (EIC), focusing on the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating effect of supervisory support. Data were collected from employees working in engineering project contexts, where innovation is critical due to the technical and complex nature of tasks. The results demonstrate that a supportive innovation climate directly enhances employees' innovation capabilities. Furthermore, self-efficacy acts as a partial mediator in this relationship, highlighting the role of individual confidence in driving innovation. Supervisory support positively moderates the relationship between innovation climate and self-efficacy, reinforcing the importance of leadership in fostering an environment conducive to innovation. This research offers theoretical insights into the interplay between organizational climate and individual performance, contributing to the literature on innovation management. Additionally, it holds practical value for organizations seeking to cultivate a robust innovation culture, ultimately driving enhanced performance and competitiveness in the engineering domain.
Keywords: Innovation Climate, Engineering Innovation Capability, Self-Efficacy, Supervisory Support, Leadership, Organizational Innovation
APA Citation: Yu Jian (2026). How Organizational Innovation Climate Affect Engineering Innovation Capability in Engineering Owner: Considering the Roles of Supervisory Support and Employees' Self-efficacy. Academic Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(6), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.62051/ajmse.v1n6.10

References

  1. Dulaimi, M. F., Ling, F. Y., Ofori, G., et al. (2002). Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 30(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210210134858.
  2. Cao, R., & Jiang, R. (2022). Resolving strategic dilemmas in ambidextrous organizations: An integrated second-order factor model perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924731.
  3. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701.
  4. Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., et al. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.312.
  5. Montani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12066.
  6. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235–258.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C
  8. Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0291-y.
  9. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429.
  10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
  11. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069410.
  12. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., et al. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995.
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., et al. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review. Energy Efficiency, 11(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9547-y.
  15. Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(91)90024-8.
  16. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287.
  17. Choi, B. K., Moon, H. K., & Ko, W. (2013). An organization's ethical climate, innovation, and performance. Management Decision, 51(6), 1250–1275. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2012-0581.
  18. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Richard, B., & Kalle, L. (2025). Breakthrough teams in incumbent firms: how relational climate and boundary mechanisms affect radical innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0107.
  20. Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8.
  21. Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., Campbell-Bush, E. M., et al. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032668.
  22. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.
  23. Meng, B., & Qin, X. (2025). Organizational culture and innovation capability: Evaluating the impact of internal factors on corporate innovation. In Proceedings of the 2025 2nd International Conference on Big Data and Digital Management. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3768801.3768897.
  24. Mendoza-Silva, A. (2020). Innovation capability: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0189.
  25. Wang, L., Li, S., & You, Z. (2020). The effects of knowledge transfer on innovation capability: A moderated mediation model of absorptive capability and network reliance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100372.
  26. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
  27. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078.
  28. Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00115-3.
  29. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., et al. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565.
  30. He, L., Yang, W., Miao, J., et al. (2024). The impact of supervisory career support on employees’ well-being: A dual path model of opportunity and ability. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 26(11), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2024.052701.
  31. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530.
  32. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90027-2.
  33. Assefa, Y., Moges, B., Tilwani, S., et al. (2024). The mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) in the structural relationship between organizational justice and employee voice behaviour in higher education. Heliyon, 10(4), e26242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26242.
  34. Moleka, P. (2024). The role of leadership in fostering innovation: A qualitative study in organizational settings. Advanced Research in Economics and Business Strategy Journal, 5, 48–53.
  35. Dayant, P., Eliyana, A., Emur, A., et al. (2022). Supportive leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 74–80.
  36. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  37. Choi, W. S., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: An empirical study of moderated mediation model of self-efficacy, perceived organizational support, and leader–member exchange. Behavioral Sciences, 11(7), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070182.
  38. Wu, R., Feng, X., Zhai, Z., et al. (2026). Relationships between organizational innovation climate, creative self-efficacy, and innovation performance: A cross-sectional study in public hospitals. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261132148.
  39. Mesterova, J., Prochazka, J., & Vaculik, M. (2015). Relationship between self-efficacy, transformational leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 3(2), 109–122.
  40. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.3.2.109-122
  41. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865.
  42. Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000098.
  43. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  44. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069414.
  45. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86.
  46. https://doi.org/10.5465/256352
  47. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  48. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  49. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
  50. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  51. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  52. Munir, R., & Beh, L.-S. (2019). Measuring and enhancing organisational creative climate, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior in startups development. The Bottom Line, 32(4), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/TBL-05-2019-0064.
  53. Purnama, Y. H., Tjahjono, H. K., & Elqadri, Z. M. (2021). Innovative work behavior: The role of self-efficacy and organizational climates. In Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 348–357). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70577-2_34.
  54. Premchandran, R., & Priydarshi, P. (2018). Do boundary preferences, work-family self-efficacy and proactive personality predict job satisfaction? The mediating role of work-family enrichment. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 7(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-04-2018-0028.
  55. Sanz-Valle, R., & Jiménez, D. (2018). HRM and product innovation: does innovative work behaviour mediate that relationship? Management Decision, 56(6), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2017-0570.
  56. Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257.
  57. Nafees, M., Khan, S., & Imran, A. (2019). Influence of transformational leadership on innovative work behaviour, and mediating role of teachers self efficacy and innovative climate: insight from engineering institutions. Middle East Journal of Management, 6(4), 359. https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2019.103302.