The Influence Mechanism of Supervisor’s Moral Leadership on Construction Workers’ Safety Participation Behavior

Download PDF
Abstract: To reveal the driving path of supervisor’s moral leadership on workers’ proactive safety behavior in the context of Chinese construction management, this study constructs a conceptual model based on social exchange theory and cognitive appraisal theory, examining the relationships between moral leadership, team safety climate, psychological safety, and workers’ safety participation behavior. Data were collected from 268 valid questionnaires and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that: 1) Moral leadership directly and positively affects safety participation behavior (effect size = 0.180), and also exerts a positive indirect effect (total indirect effect size = 0.388); 2) Moral leadership significantly shapes team safety climate (effect size = 0.350), which in turn promotes safety participation behavior (effect size = 0.450), with safety climate playing a partial mediating role (effect size = 0.157); 3) Moral leadership significantly enhances workers’ psychological safety (effect size = 0.420), which positively influences safety participation behavior (effect size = 0.550), with psychological safety also serving as a partial mediator (effect size = 0.231). This study extends the application of paternalistic leadership theory in construction safety by focusing on the moral dimension, providing empirical evidence for construction firms to foster workers’ proactive safety behaviors through enhancing supervisors’ moral competence.
Keywords: Moral Leadership, Workers’ Safety Participation Behavior, Safety Climate, Psychological Safety, Structural Equation Modeling
APA Citation: Jie Liu (2026). The Influence Mechanism of Supervisor’s Moral Leadership on Construction Workers’ Safety Participation Behavior. Academic Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(6), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.62051/ajmse.v1n6.03

References

  1. Zhang, J. S., Huang, Y. L., Li, H. J., et al. (2024). Study on coupling of subway shield tunneling safety risk based on improved N K model. China Safety Science Journal, 34(02), 67 75.
  2. Zhang, J. S., Li, H. J., & Cui, L. Y. (2016). Total loss framework for safety accident in construction enterprise. China Safety Science Journal, 26(08), 151 156.
  3. Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development. (n.d.). Situation of production safety accidents in housing and municipal engineering projects [EB/OL]. Retrieved October 20, 2024, from https://zlaq.mohurd.gov.cn/ fwmh/ bjxcjgl/ fwmh/pages/default/index.html.
  4. Chen, H. H., Li, H. J., & Goh, Y. M. (2021). A review of construction safety climate: definitions, factors, relationship with safety behavior and research agenda. Safety Science, 142, 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105391.
  5. Xia, N. N., Griffin, M. A., Xie, Q. H., et al. (2023). Antecedents of workplace safety behavior: meta analysis in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(4), 04023009. https://doi.org/ 10. 1061/ (ASCE)CO.1943 7862.0002437.
  6. Xia, N. N., Li, D. Z., Ye, G., et al. (2021). A literature review on antecedents of employees’ safety behavior in construction projects. China Safety Science Journal, 31(06), 44 55.
  7. Li, S. Q., Wu, X. Y., Wang, X. Z., et al. (2020). Relationship between social capital, safety competency, and safety behaviors of construction workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943 7862.0001849.
  8. Xia, N. N., Ding, S. T., Ling, T., et al. (2024). Safety climate in construction: a systematic literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(10), 3973 4000. https://doi.org/10. 1108/ ECAM 07 2023 0645.
  9. Zheng, J., Gou, X., Li, H., et al. (2021). Linking work family conflict and burnout from the emotional resource perspective for construction professionals. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(5), 1093 1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB 05 2020 0152.
  10. He, C. Q., McCabe, B., & Jia, G. S. (2021). Effect of leader member exchange on construction worker safety behavior: safety climate and psychological capital as the mediators. Safety Science, 142, 105401. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/ j.ssci.2021.105401.
  11. Wu, C. L., Yao, H., Ning, X., et al. (2021). Emergence of informal safety leadership: a social cognitive process for accident prevention. Production and Operations Management, 30(11), 4288 4305. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ poms. 13480.
  12. Cheng, L., Yu, H. B., & An, R. (2019). Does paternalistic leadership hinder organizational innovation in high tech enterprises?: models of regulated mediation based on organizational strategies and organizational culture. Science and Technology Management Research, 39(18), 149 153.
  13. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Wu, T. Y. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89 117. https://doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1467 839X.2004.00137.x.
  14. Wu, M., Huang, X., & Chan, S. C. H. (2012). The influencing mechanisms of paternalistic leadership in China's Mainland. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4), 631 648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2012.681430.
  15. Zhang, N., Liu, S. Z., & Pan, B. W. (2021). Paternalistic leadership and safety participation of high speed railway drivers in China: the mediating role of leader member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 591670. https: //doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591670.
  16. Zhu, Y. Y., Ma, Y., Ouyang, C. H., et al. (2022). Paternalistic leadership and craftsmanship of manufacturing employees: influence of job involvement and team positive emotional climate. Journal of Systems & Management, 31(01), 89 103.
  17. Liu, Y. Y., Liu, P. Q., Liu, D. X., et al. (2022). Effect of paternalistic leadership on safety performance of transit bus drivers: Activation effect of positive followership traits. Safety Science, 153, 105821. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ssci. 2022. 105821.
  18. Ta, M. T. D., Kim, T. E., & Gausdal, A. H. (2022). Leadership styles and safety performance in high risk industries: a systematic review. Safety and Reliability, 41(1), 10 44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2022.2033117.
  19. Ma, H., Wu, Z. G., & Chang, P. (2021). Social impacts on hazard perception of construction workers: A system dynamics model analysis. Safety Science, 138, 105240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105240.
  20. Li, N., & Yan, J. (2007). The mechanism of how trust climate impacts on individual performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, (06), 1111 1121.
  21. Duan, J. Y. (2012). The Influence of paternalistic leadership on employee voice behavior: mediated by psychological safety. Management Review, 24(10), 109 116+142.
  22. Hong, Y., & Wang, D. X. (2011). Can Supervisors win over followers by virtue? study on the effects of ethical leadership from perspectives of social learning and social exchange. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 32(07), 175 179.
  23. Zhao, X. W., Wang, M., Xiao, J. C., et al. (2024). How a team’s external territorial behavior affects team knowledge sharing: the role of team psychological safety climate and team mindfulness. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 41(14), 142 150.
  24. Wu, Y. Z. (2022). Leadership and employee knowledge hiding: the mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of motivational climate. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 28(03), 128 141.
  25. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Fan, J. L. (2000). Paternalistic leadership scale: construction and measurement of the triadic model. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3 64.
  26. Dedobbeleer, N., & Beland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22(2), 97 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022 4375(91)90017 2.
  27. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946 953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021 9010.91.4.946.
  28. Cai, Y. H., Qu, Y., & Tang, R. J. (2024). The relationship between paternalistic leadership behavior and professional learning communities: the mediating role of interpersonal trust. Educational Science Research, (03), 76 83.
  29. Zhao, R. N., Jia, J. F., Yan, J. Q., et al. (2022). The influence of benevolent authoritarian and moral authoritarian leadership on trust in leader and knowledge sharing based on ambidextrous leadership perspective. Chinese Journal of Management, 19(10), 1478 1488.
  30. Zhang, L. M., Chen, H. Y., Li, H. X., et al. (2018). Perceiving interactions and dynamics of safety leadership in construction projects. Safety Science, 106, 66 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.021.
  31. Mullen, J. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). Safety leadership: A longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(2), 253 272. https:// doi. org/10.1348/096317908X325313.
  32. Gao, W. M., Cao, Q. R., & Xu, Z. Q. (2017). The impact of ethical leadership on employee safety performance: the cross level mediating effect of safety climate and psychological capital. Management Review, 29(11), 116 128.